What can Italy and Malta’s extent of compliance with EU equality principles and the EU’s legal framework concerning their implementation of anti-LGBTQ+ hate crime and hate speech legislation be attributed to?

Paulette Freixas Rey

IE University, PPLE, 2028

E-mail: pfreixas.ieu2024@student.ie.edu

Abstract

This paper examines the extent of compliance with EU equality principles and legal frameworks concerning LGBTQ+ hate speech and hate crime legislation in Malta and Italy, highlighting the factors contributing to their stark divergence. While Malta has fully integrated EU mandates, establishing comprehensive legal protections and proactive policies, Italy has exhibited legislative inertia, influenced by deep-seated cultural and political resistance. The consequences of this disparity are evident: Malta’s legal framework fosters a safer, more inclusive society, whereas Italy ‘s lack of protections correlates with rising hate crimes and societal exclusion of LGBTQ+ individuals. This paper

analyzes the structural, political, and cultural factors shaping each country ‘s approach, arguing that Italy must implement legal reforms, institutional changes, and public policy initiatives to align with EU standards. The findings underscore the broader implications of inconsistent compliance within the EU, emphasizing the urgent need for harmonized legal protections to safeguard human rights and equality across member states.

READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE (Page 26-34 )

Keywords: LGBTQ+ rights, EU law, Malta, Italy

No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

We use both our own and third-party cookies to enhance our services and to offer you the content that most suits your preferences by analysing your browsing habits. Your continued use of the site means that you accept these cookies. You may change your settings and obtain more information here. Accept